Speakers

Joseph Ahn MD
Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Meghan Aversa MD, MS, FRCPC
University Health Network

Mamatha Bhat MD, MSc, PhD, FRCPC
Symposium Co-Chair and Transplant AI Initiative Co-Lead
University Health Network

Paul Friedman MD
Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Julie Heimbach MD
Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Robert Huebert MD
Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Deepali Kumar MD, MSc, FRCPC
University Health Network

Girish Mour MBBS
Mayo Clinic, Arizona

Nicholas Papernot PhD
University of Toronto

Pranav Rajpurkar PhD
Harvard University

Andrew Rule MD
Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Tuomas Sandholm PhD
Carnegie Mellon University

Steve Schudlo
University Health Network

Vijay Shah MD
Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Aman Sidhu MD
Symposium Co-Chair and Transplant AI Initiative Co-Lead
University Health Network

Doug Simonetto MD
Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Mark Stegall MD
Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Mary Vyas MA, SM
PSC Partners Seeking a Cure

Brad Wouters PhD
University Health Network


Faculty Disclosure

It is the policy of the University of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Continuing Professional Development to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all its individually accredited or jointly accredited educational programs.

Speakers and/or planning committee members, participating in University of Toronto accredited programs, are expected to disclose to the program audience any real or apparent conflict(s) of interest that may have a direct bearing on the subject matter of the continuing education program. This pertains but is not limited to relationships within the last TWO (2) years with not-for-profit organizations, pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or other corporations whose products or services are related to the subject matter of the presentation topic.

The intent of this policy is not to prevent a speaker with a potential conflict of interest from making a presentation. It is merely intended that any potential conflict should be identified openly so that the listeners may form their own judgments about the presentation with the full disclosure of facts.

It remains for the audience to determine whether the speaker’s outside interests may reflect a possible bias in either the exposition or the conclusions presented.